This week we study a rich section of the Bible called “Trumah” starting at Exodus 25. Trumah marks a major shift of gears from the narrative of the Exodus to the topic of building the Tabernacle, “Mishkan” in Hebrew. The Mishkan was an ornate tent housing the holy ark and other items surrounded by a courtyard containing an altar. This portable Temple complex served as the place for ritual sacrifices.
Trumah opens with the commandment to Moses to accept material donations to build the Mishkan from anyone who is motivated in their heart to bring them, Ex 25:2. The people are never commanded to give the gold, silver, etc., rather the donations must be given voluntary and wholeheartedly (more on that later).
We also learn about the items used in the Tabernacle, including the Ark of the Covenant, the Gold Menorah, and Table for show breads. Then, in Exodus 26, the Bible teaches the architecture of the Tabernacle and courtyard, and how the tent, walls, and coverings were constructed.

The Bible is not always written in chronological order. Rashi points out that God’s instructions to build the Tabernacle were only given after the golden calf debacle, which appears later in Ex 32. Some sources explain that if not for the sin of the calf, the Jews would not have needed the Tabernacle as a central location to connect to God and gain atonement.
Prior to the golden calf, offerings were brought by each family individually. The sacrifice was normally performed by the father or first born son, on a private family altar (Ex 24:5). Each family was offering directly to God without intermediaries.
After the calf, the responsibility for ritual sacrifice shifts from the first born son of each family to the priests (Cohanim or Kohanim). At that time there were only five Kohanim, Aaron and his sons. This was a drastic change centralizing a vital aspect of religious practice.
Building the Tabernacle was a critical juncture in our historical-spiritual development. Judaism is in a real sense a decentralized religion that emphasizes individual authority, when exercised within proper limits. The Jews began as just one man, Abraham, standing steadfast against the establishment culture of idolatrous polytheism and subjective immorality. In Genesis we learned how this man with a mission blossomed into a family, 12 brother-tribes, then a nation during the exile in Egypt.
But even as a nation, individual authority was always the ideal. See Judges 21:25 and Micah 4:4. Each man as head of the household was reponsible for the spiritual well being of his family. A man was expected to set the example for religious dedication, educate his children and guide the entire family in service of God in his own way.
However, whenever individuals stray too far from the spiritual norm, God finds a way to recentralize authority in order restore key values. Thus we see the national ritual in the Tabernacle to correct the calf. When sin made the individual Jewish tribes vulnerable to outside attack, the Judges (Gideon, Deborah, Samson and others) were needed to unite the tribes against pagan enemies and remind them to uphold Jewish spiritual commitments. However, the judges were temporary leaders for a confederation of tribes, not a central dynasty.
Later, appointing a king was necessary to consolidate political and military power when a lack of unity among the Jewish tribes had invited aggression by idolaters. Eventually, the Temple in Jerusalem was built by Divine command, started by King David and completed by King Solomon. This had the practical effect of bringing religious unity to the disparate tribes settled over the length and breadth of the Holy Land, who had been previously allowed to bring offerings to God on local and private altars. Now only the central altar at the Temple was used, and every man who could would make pilgrimages three times a year to Jerusalem.
While each tribe had their own leadership as well, there was now a federal capital. With the Temple as the focal point of Jewish ritual, all of the separate tribes would come together as one for festivals. Jerusalem became the religious, spiritual, and political capital of the Jewish nation. Each tribe was distinct and had self rule, but was subordinate to the king, similar to a modern state of the United States.

After Solomon’s son Rehavam took the throne (and raised taxes), there was a counter reaction to this centralization of power. A political schism erupted between Judah, the southern kingdom, and Israel, the northern area. The leader of the north, Yeravam ben Navat, refused to allow his subjects to go to the Temple in Jerusalem for pilgrimages. He feared they would become loyal to Rehavam instead of to him. Yeravam was told by God that he would be equal to King David if he allowed pilgrimage to Jerusalem, but he threw away that chance and turned to idolatry (Talmud, Sanhedrin 102a).
It appears to me that God was willing to keep Yeravam as a political king as long as he allowed Jerusalem to be the religious capital of the Jews. Political and religious power are meant to be independent of one another in Jewish wisdom. This concept of separation of Temple and state is important for the issue of do we define Jewish as a religious, political, of genealogical identity. This struggle over the value and extent of centralization led to the split of the kingdoms.

When the Temple was destroyed, authority was fractured, and the sages of that generation took great pains to uphold rabbinical authority to keep order in that chaotic time. At the time of the bloody Roman siege leading to the destruction, the chief rabbi was Yochanon ben Zakkai. He escaped from Jerusalem and was granted requests by Emperor Vespasian. He assumed the Romans would not spare Jerusalem and the Temple, so he decided to ask Vespasian to save the scholarly city and academy of Yavneh, and the royal house of the prince, the descendants of King David (Talmud, Gittin 56).
The central political authority had failed against the might of Rome, and a decentralized religious authority was needed to keep the Jewish people together without a king or Temple. This was another massive turning point in Jewish history, when we transitions to being nation without a state for 1900 years. [Yochanon ben Zakkai himself was plagued by this decision until his last words on his death bed, Talmud Brakhot 28b וְהָכִינוּ כִּסֵּא לְחִזְקִיָּהוּ מֶלֶךְ יְהוּדָה שֶׁבָּא].

As centuries gave way to millennia, Jews have been scattered all over the earth, developing local customs and variations on prayers and rituals. However, conventional Jews are still following the exact same legal guidelines from Sinai, Jerusalem and Yavneh, the Law from 4000, 3000, and 2000 years ago. Our individualism is exercised within the boundaries of Jewish law. In the future we will all be reunited in Jerusalem with a rebuilt Temple (may it be soon), committed to one spiritual goal.
Not to say that Jews will all become the same again, far from it; the 12 tribes were also different with unique missions. Rather, we will again have a central focus that brings us together despite all our differences. This is the ongoing push and pull tension between individuality and centralized power in Judaism.
Micah 4:4 deals with “the end of the days“, describing our future situation after Messianic redemption as “each man under his own vine and under his own fig tree, and no one shall intimidate…” This prophecy is speaking of a return to individual autonomy, even though during this era the Temple will be rebuilt and everyone* will go up to Jerusalem for festivals.
In the Messianic phase there is both individual and central authority, but they will be reconciled. The “vine” and “fig” here are not only literal, these are profound esoteric concepts relating back to the first man. We understand that each type of grape requires a specific approach to produce fine wine.

This prophecy hints that each man, within the bounds of Jewish law, will be his own master, develop his own unique spiritual talents, and pursue his personal chosen path to connect with God. No external human authority will be needed to nudge a man onto the proper path, he will develop and walk it for himself.
Each man means everyone, Jew and non Jew. Isaiah 56:7: “Their burnt offerings and sacrifices will be accepted on My altar; for My house will be called a house of prayer for all nations”.
Balanced freedom
While personal autonomy is idealized in the prophets, it was not always practical to enjoy the freedom of decentralized authority. The establishment of the monarchy was seen as a necessary evil; Samuel the prophet warns the people that a king will have great power over them, limit individual freedoms and impose taxes, I Samuel 8 [amazing: a 10% government tax was perceived as oppressive!]
However, the people decided, voted, that as this juncture they needed to appoint a king to lead them in war against the aggressive idolaters. They felt that it was a practical necessity to give up some individual freedom to preserve group unity, when they were faced with invading idolatrous armies led by strong kings.

Here too in Trumah, after the golden calf episode, there is a realization that a stronger central spiritual authority is necessary. Giving individuals too much leeway in their personal spiritual choices, without a leadership to draw correct examples from, leads to disaster.
As we will later discuss, God willing, the instigators of the golden calf idol were the “mixed multitude”, people who left Egypt along with the Jews but were not actual descendants of Jacob. God faulted the actual sons of Jacob because they did not step up and enforce our ancient spiritual values when these people demanded an idol.
When the people as a whole pass the buck, God steps in and arranges history to install a person where the buck is going to stop. Thus the priests take center stage and the Tabernacle takes the place of individual and family altars.
Fitting in as an individual
In Trumah, we see that every Jew, men, women, and children, was involved in donating and fabricating to build the Tabernacle. While it is a place where only the Kohanim, the priests, did the actual Divine service, each individual wants a share in it. This involvement in the Tabernacle took the place of individual offerings brought by each family.
Every individual needs to find a way to fit into their society. When God told Moses to accept the donations that the people chose to bring, God was reminding us that we need to fit in on our own terms, not in the way outside society pushes on us. The Tabernacle will be built without taxes or requisitions, each person will give what he chooses and between all of them the job will be complete.
You choose what you want to give to your society, how you want to be a part of the group and participate in the economy and in public life. You, in your own heart, make your decision of what wisdom, energy and time you want to give to others, and to society at large.
The Tabernacle is a diorama of the creation of the universe. The ancient Medrash Rabbah explains how each part of the Tabernacle corresponds to creation: the tent (Exodus 26:7) was spread like the heavens (based on Psalms 104:2) on the first day; the divider between the Holy and the Holy of Holies” (Exodus 26:33) was like the heavenly firmament dividing between the waters and the upper waters (Genesis 1:6).
Other Medrashim point out that the Tabernacle contained elements of all parts of creation: inanimate and animate, animal, plant, mineral. The Tabernacle is a miniature creation, a man made reminder of the original Divine creation of the universe.

In conventional Jewish thinking, every man is also a microcosm of all creation. Jewish law has a concept that killing one person is destroying an entire world while saving one human life is like saving an entire world. The Talmud, Sanhedrin 37a, states: “For this reason was man created alone, to teach that whoever destroys a single soul, the Bible imputes guilt to him as though he had destroyed an entire world; and whoever preserves a single soul, the Bible ascribes merit to him as though he had preserved an entire world.”

Not only is each man created as a unique individual, but “And God created man in His image, in the image of God He created him.” (Genesis 1:27). Our sages point out the amazing contrast: A human being can mint many coins with the same stamp, but each one is exactly like every other one; while God made many human beings with the same stamp, and each and every one is unique.” (Mishna Sanhedrin 4:5).
Naturally, you already know that God has no physical shape, image, or “stamp”. Anthropomorphisms are not to be taken literally. See also NefeshHaChaim 1:1. Rambam (aka Maimonides, in Teshuvah 5:1) explains that in all of creation only mankind resembles God in that we were made with free will. That is the true stamp our sages are referring to.
Because we have free will (a limited free will), our decisions and actions matter. Ancient Jewish mysticism teaches that every man, on the soul level, is woven into the fabric of creation in such a way as to be interdependent with all of creation. If a man chooses to elevate himself, for example by giving charity, he changes himself into a more charitable person, and also changes the balance of the entire universe to be a more charitable place (see Rambam, laws of return 3:4). He is molding the entire world by his decisions and actions.
Everything you do, even each thought, ripples throughout the universe. Our mystics have been teaching this concept for millennia. The Zohar, riffing on the flood of Noah, refers to scientific wisdom as “the wellsprings from below,” while wisdom from Torah is “the windows of heaven.”
This interconnectedness sounds less far fetched in the internet age, and after the discovery of quantum entanglement. It is possible that your inner thoughts, physically manifested as charges jumping in your neurons, can have a very subtle effect on the universe. Electric charge moving induces both electric and magnetic fields. A sensitive enough system could detect this.
It could be that in the future scientists will discover what Jewish mysticism has been saying for thousands of years.
Individual with God
We were chosen to be the partner with God in creation (a junior partner). This is one of the secrets in Genesis 1:26 “let us make man“. Angels do not create, they do not develop or change. God is not talking to angels. In one sense, God is using the ‘royal plural’. In truth, God is talking to man. To us. To you!
Telling you: “Let us make man!” Join God in the work of making yourself into a man.
Stop right here and reflect: You are an entire world. There is no one exactly like you in existence. There never was before and there never will be again.
You have unique talents and hold tremendous potential: You are a world unto yourself, and you can create worlds, or destroy them. You have been given a mission to make yourself into whatever you choose to be and you are infused with the power to accomplish anything. Your choices matter.
My rabbi taught us an amazing thing. He said take every man seriously. This man in front of you could cure cancer. He could start a nuclear war (this was back when that was the greatest fear). Most of all, take yourself seriously.
Brothers, you can become partners in the most important job of your life: creating your own life. You, like the Tabernacle, are a microcosm of the universe, containing every aspect and energy of creation. You have the responsibility to make your choices and develop your personal powers, and become the man you envision.
And as we are all interconnected, every thing you do also changes every element of the universe. Man is the crown of creation, the last being created (Talmud, Sanhedrin 38a). Everything created before man was just to prepare for us. For you! Our Sages say: בִּשְׁבִילִי נִבְרָא הָעוֹלָם “Bishvili nivra ha’olam” For my sake, was the universe created” (Mishna Sanhedrin 4:5).

There is a related concept in modern “red pill” parlance: Be Your Mental Point of Origin.* Loosely defined, this is putting yourself as your own first priority, and making decisions based on the question “how will this affect me?” This may sound selfish, but is closely tied in to the Jewish concept of individuality and self worth based on each of us being in the “Divine image”.
[*Nibul peh warning for Jews, unclean language and adult content on that site]
In Judaism, we put God first, but God wants each of us to succeed and connect to the Eternal, which requires putting our own self development first so we are able to get closer to God and do his will. While Jews are acutely aware our responsibilities to the group, you can’t help anyone until you help yourself first. You can’t bring a family or community closer to God if you don’t work on yourself.
One of the most damaging problems in modern mainstream society as that men and boys are given the message that they are not important, not worthwhile to invest in. Men are the object of jokes and ridicule in the media. Masculinity is condemned. In public schools boys are taught like they are dysfunctional girls (my kids are not in public schools, but this is what people tell me). Men are told to serve their country, serve their society, to serve women. They are not told that they are worth anything themselves.
As our ancient sages knew, there is a lot of variation among men. However, it seems to me that most men, most of the time, are mostly content with their lot. There are a lot of reasons not to change. It takes work, you might not succeed, you need a stable job to pay the mortgage and fear taking risks.
So most men, most of the time, do not work on themselves in a serious, methodical way. They are okay with their lot, they don’t feel a need for more. In modern “red pill” parlance, they could be identified as “beta”. This is not a pejorative. They are good men, not hurting anyone, contributing and going along with the flow of their society.
But here’s the rub: mainstream society has changed radically over the past 60 years, and just going along with the flow doesn’t work as well as it used to. It isn’t guaranteed to get a decent outcome for a man like it used to. Rollo explains this concept in the second set of books. Many men never realize that mainstream society has changed the social rules on them, has thrown out the “old books” and is now operating from a different software or set of “rule books”.
Men who just want to go with the flow get frustrated, they are still playing by rules that are now ignored. Others realize the changes and retreat from some aspects of society to protect themselves (MGTOW). A small minority of men realize the challenge and want to change themselves.
When you find it difficult to change, that is a fair assessment. It’s exactly as hard as you perceive it to be. Despite our socialization, our generation of young men is beginning to realize going with the flow is not working. As a man, the mainstream culture no longer has your back. Playing by the old rules doesn’t pay anymore.
When the situation looks bleak, that is an impetus to act and change, evolve if you like. Due to the current dysfunctional social order, there is a tremendous potential energy that can push men to work on ourselves, learn, adapt, and self actualize. There are also many pitfalls and so much false information. Lies crisscross the world before truth can put shoes on.
I see a lot of movement, but it is too soon to know where this energy is going and where we will end up. There is deep dissatisfaction with the default mainstream approach to life. You could fairly say that modern centralized authorities such as the mass media, education, government etc. have failed men. Men are sick of corrupt authorities who can’t control themselves having the arrogance to try to control each individual man as much as possible.
It could be that this generation of men responds by becoming more self motivated and individualistic, even while our modern technology which has brought about unimagined interconnectedness. On a deeper level, having the ability to connect allows men to see new options to choose for their paths through life. Having access to ideas of personal empowerment lets us stray farther from the normal, average “old books” way of live. Again, that ancient tension between central and individual authority is still ongoing.
I recognize that not everyone will seize their own reins and ride to the victory of their choosing. One of the valuable concepts in Jewish philosophy which encourages a stable, healthy society, is that you as a Jewish man don’t have to be exceptional to contribute to the universe. Regular daily acts, simple decisions, small donations, little efforts here and there, these all make changes in the fabric of reality. What you do in your daily life, even if it seems minute or normal, is already exceptional. This is an amazing concept, but should not be taken as a license for complacency.
Rebi (Yehudah HaNassi, 1900 years ago in Israel) used to say; “Be careful about how you do a small deed, just as if it were a big one, for you do not know the reward of commandments.” (Avot 2:1). We don’t know how our actions change the fabric of creation, or which tiny actions create lasting changes. Your example doing just one thing to the best of your ability may help another man improve, he may inspire others. Our behavior during morning prayers or on the subway could send a spiritual tidal wave through the cosmos.
A regular Jewish man, every day is praying with his fellows, learning a little, working to provide for a family, trying to keep the Sabbath, raising children and grandchildren to value the Torah, may think he is just going with the flow. He is actually causing profound changes in himself, his family, and in the entire universe. He is a partner in creation, building himself, his family, his community. Realizing this can help him to focus his energies on his responsibilities, and to do even more. Even if he is just going about his regular day, he is accomplishing sublime and eternal things.

Being part of an ancient religious minority provides some buffer against the changes in mainstream society that have upended the prior system and social expectations. Within our subculture a man can still afford to “go with the flow” and still enjoy some level of personal success, start a family, and know he is doing something valuable with his life. This is because the flow in our culture rewards a man for his efforts, a benefit that is evaporating in mainstream society.
The sense we get is that everyone in this generation is being called on to rise to new challenges. It’s no longer enough to just go along with the status quo, and keep following the standard path through life that mainstream society pushes on us. It may be time once again for a needed rebalance to reduce the role and influence of central authority over our personal decisions and paths through life.
We all have our unique personalities and must find new ways to succeed based on our individuality rather than what mainstream ‘society’ and cultural authority wants or demands from us. When the going gets tough…
This requires investment in self improvement, and the realization that no matter what level we are on now, we all have so much more we can accomplish. We are being urged to realize that each of us is a complete universe with profound individual value, take ourselves seriously, and recreate ourselves into better men.