Gentlemen, we have an amazing opportunity to glean priceless insights from the Bible. This ancient wisdom from millennia ago applies directly to marriage and masculinity today. Let’s dive in.
This week we read Leviticus 9:1–11:47, the portion called “Shemini” meaning the eighth. The number Eight in mystical sources signifies going above and beyond natural limits. We have cycle of seven days, with the Sabbath every seventh. The Jews also plant for six years, and let the earth go on the seventh. The eighth represents transcending the natural order.
In Shemini, the Bible discusses the inauguration of the Tabernacle, the portable Temple complex that the Jewish people used thousands of years ago as the focal point of worship and sacrifices. Moses erected the Tabernacle and served as temporary high priest for seven days.
On the eighth day, Aaron takes over as permanent high priest (Cohen Gadol) and brings special sacrifices to inaugurate the complex. Amidst national celebration, God rests a Divine cloud of glory over the Tabernacle, showing His favor to the Jewish people.
Then a shocking tragedy smashes their joy: Aaron’s sons, Nadav and Avihu enter the holiest chamber in the Tabernacle and are struck dead (Lev 10). They had wanted to bring their own offerings but instead become burnt offerings.

Our sages explain that there were multiple reasons that the sons of Aaron were taken by God, including drinking wine beforehand, and deciding a legal matter without consulting their Rabbi. However, one of the main reasons given are that they did not marry (Rashi from Medrash Rabbah).
The Torah states that a high priest must be married, in Numbers 3:4 and Leviticus 16:6, “his house” refers to his wife. This is the only position in Jewish theology that requires marriage, even a king could be a bachelor.
Nadav and Avihu chose not to get married for what they saw as perfectly valid spiritual reasons. The responsibility to support a wife and family greatly detracts from the time and energy a man can devote to divine service. They wanted to be totally dedicated to God, not to another person.

Our sages millennia ago discussed this concept in the Talmud, Kiddushin 29b:
ת”ר ללמוד תורה ולישא אשה ילמוד תורה ואח”כ ישא אשה ואם א”א לו בלא אשה ישא אשה ואח”כ ילמוד תורה אמר רב יהודה אמר שמואל הלכה נושא אשה ואח”כ ילמוד תורה
The Sages taught: To study Torah or to marry a woman, which should you do first? You should study Torah and afterward marry a woman. And if it is impossible for you to be without a wife, you should marry a woman and then study Torah. Rav Yehuda says that Shmuel said: The halakha (final ruling) is that you should marry a woman and afterward study Torah.
A wife prevents a man from sin, as she is available to provide a healthy outlet for his natural sexual energy. Our sages recommended early marriage to prevent a young man from having lustful thoughts. Acquiring Wisdom for life is vital for every man, but it is also important to learn in a state of purity from sin and sexual thoughts. See also Talmud Menahot 110a.
Our sages consider intimacy to be a normal and vital part of a man’s life. A healthy man should have a healthy sex life. So, based on the prevailing views of conventional Jewish philosophy, Nadav and Avihu should have gotten married. Obviously as students of Moses and Aaron they were aware of these ideas. So why didn’t they?
The Gemara in Kiddushin continues:
ר’ יוחנן אמר ריחיים בצוארו ויעסוק בתורה?! ולא פליגי הא לן והא להו:
Rabbi Yoḥanan says: With a millstone hanging from his neck can he engage in Torah study?! (if he marries first and has the responsibility of providing for his family weighing upon him).
The Gemara states: he does not disagree with Shmuel, rather this is for us Jews of Babylonia, whereas the other idea is referring to those living in Israel.
[Rabbi Yochanon himself married and had ten sons, after he was already a scholar]

Our commentators explain that in that era, the Jews in Babylonia were wealthy, and would marry and then immediately leave town to learn Torah in Israel, away from their wife. The families of the bride and groom would support the wife while the man pursued advanced Torah studies and became a scholar. A form of this custom continues today, when the parents of the newlyweds try to support the couple for a period while the man engages in full time Torah learning.
The poorer students from Israel could not afford to support a wife while learning abroad. So they put of marriage until they had learned more Wisdom. This is Rashi’s explanation; Tosafot in Menahot 110a states that the Israelis were more wealthy and the advice was for the Babylonians to travel to Israel to learn before they married. That may have been true at a different time period. Some Rishonim note that women in Bavel worked to support their husbands who were learning. This is a source for the celebrated Kollel Wife who works to support the family while the man learns.
Jews in Babylonia and Israel still married much earlier than is typical in modern mainstream society. In both locations, men would have the opportunity to pursue their own education and self development before being obligated to give their time and energy in support of their family.
We see that a man cannot wholly devote himself to his mission when he has the burden of caring for a wife and children. A man needs to educate and develop himself, learn wisdom, and gain a healthy understanding of the world before he tries his hand at marriage.
Aaron’s sons considered themselves in the category of men who needed to learn more and improve themselves before they would consider marriage and family. It sounds like Nadav and Avihu were motivated by self development and possessed an incredible amount of self awareness and patience. They wanted to reach the highest levels of serving God before they would start a family, which would reduce their ability to be dedicated to God.
Amazingly, the Bible teaches us that they were dead wrong.

I have an explanation. Nadav and Avihu, by not marrying, held themselves out as being unfinished. They were giving the impression that they needed more study and self development before they could marry and start a family.
If that was their honest and accurate self assessment, they would not have been punished. But our ancient sages point out that their other actions were the opposite of this aura of humility:
Nadav and Avihu made their own legal ruling that they could bring offerings without being commanded by God, and did so without consulting their own rabbis, Moses and Aaron. They brought their own unsanctified fire from their hearths, despite witnessing the Divine fire consuming offerings.
Then they entered the tabernacle and the Holy of Holies, a room reserved for the High Priest on Yom Kippur only, showing they thought they were on the level their father. And they drank wine first, implying that they assumed they could focus on divine service even when intoxicated and distracted.
So while delaying marriage was a reflection of their asserted humility, their other actions reveal that they were not so humble. They considered themselves as being on the highest spiritual level. Rabbi Hirsch says they were arrogant. If they felt that they were already mature enough to decide to enter the Holy of Holies, they were certainly ready to marry.
Do not think I am insulting them; Nadav and Avihu were at a spiritual level that I cannot being to fathom. God holds people at the highest levels culpable for even small mistakes.
Moses points out to Aaron that they were, in some ways, on a higher level than themselves: That is what God hinted: “Through those near to Me I will be sanctified, and be glorified before all the people.” And Aaron was silent. Lev 10:3. Our sages in the Talmud Sota 35a teach that Nadov and Avihu are called to as ‘keruvim” -literally “close ones”, implying they accomplished something amazing with their offerings.

MGTOW
There is a modern movement called Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW), that has a philosophy reminiscent of Nadav and Avihu. These men avoid marriage, some avoid any serious relationships with women. They wish to preserve their independence to pursue their chosen mission in life for their own benefit, not for the needs of a wife and family.
This movement is vastly misunderstood and unfairly ridiculed. Their idea has Biblical precedent in the sons of Aaron, and in the ancient debates of our sages about when a man can marry.
Our ancient sources teach that a man needs to develop himself first, learning both divine wisdom and practical skills, before he undertakes to care for a wife and family. A man must be able to focus on his mission (and first to decide what his mission is) without distractions. He has to build a foundation for his own life before he can help other people.
When he has attained a level of proficiency, wisdom, experience – and the self respect and recognition that flow from these – then he can decide to be a rock for others. A modern summation of this ancient concept I heard from Dr. Robert Glover: a man needs to bake himself a good cake first, his woman is just the icing on the cake.
However, in modern secular society men are fed contradictory messages about what it means to be a man. No one teaches boys how to “bake their cake”, let alone that they should focus on personal growth. Men are told (indoctrinated) that their role and goal in life should be to respect and serve women and amass resources for women and children. So they invest in their relationships, or in pleasing women generally, and put minimal effort into improving themselves. Because that is what feminist society urges them to do.
Then men are shocked when it does not pan out, when these investments in women don’t pay. Women don’t actually reward men for being their doormats and plow horses. Women are naturally hypergamous and want the best man, men with confidence and assertiveness. Men who follow the agenda are told not to be assertive, lest they offend. Society does not help, it calls men losers when they don’t win a rigged game that the media and culture told them how to play.
So today we have a generation of so called “lost boys” looking for guidance that actually works. In ancient societies, boys were given a clear path to develop themselves into accomplished men. Conventional Jewish culture provided sound guidance for a man to build himself up into something valued by his peers, an example is the ancient Mishnah in Pirke Avot (Wisdom of Fathers) 5:21. Yehudah ben Tema advises:
At five years of age the study of Scripture; At ten the study of Mishnah; At thirteen subject to the commandments; At fifteen the study of Talmud; At eighteen the bridal canopy; At twenty for pursuit of livelihood; At thirty the peak of strength; At forty wisdom; At fifty able to give counsel…
A boy was expected to build wisdom and experience and make himself into a man before marriage. This even included three years of advanced Talmud (Gemara) study before marriage.
Men understood this was expected of them and was a badge of personal accomplishment. An interesting note is that a man was advised to devote himself to his profession after marriage, his wife was expected to support his professional and even supplement the family income. A man, even after working on his basic education, marriage, and professional life, was still expected to grow in wisdom and be an asset to other men.

The appeal of the MGTOW approach is enhanced by the modern social and legal reality. 2000 years ago, when our sages were discussing if a man should pursue his own dreams first or marry first, the cultural situation was vastly different. Men could count on their society supporting the idea that the husband and father was the head of the household. This was considered completely obvious and did not even need to be said. Men had authority over their wife and family.
The legal situation too was completely alien to moderns. If a man needed to divorce his wife that was his decision; the divorced wife was entitled to one year of support (food) plus whatever amount the man had himself chosen to add to this basic level. If she had cheated or gone against societal norms, she was considered the cause of the divorce and she lost even the basic level of support. [We will learn these laws in detail in the Gemara].
The legal assumption was that the man, who had greater earning potential and the onus of educating his children, would have full custody of and be the decision maker for his offspring. Women and men were punished with death for adultery, and there was even a Divinely sanctioned loyalty test for a woman suspected of straying. Even before genetic testing, a man could be very sure that his wife’s children were his own.
The modern landscape it vastly different, with serious and sometimes fatal consequences to men. The suffering that a man can be put through to try and see his own children once a week is worse than anything ancient men would countenance.
Imagine a man from 2000 years ago hearing that in our modern enlightened society a wife could betray her husband, become impregnated by another man, and then be entitled to her husband’s house and his future income. What would he think about what we call “justice”? He would rightly call it barbaric and idiotic.
A young man considering marriage today has to account for a hostile cultural, social, and legal climate that does not have his best interests in mind. Modern secular society could be fairly seen as anti-family, thanks to decades of feminist propaganda supplanting traditional values. It’s a veritable minefield for a modern man who wants a family. We have discussed related topics regarding our Responsibility to brothers and in Chanukah and the Red Pill.
However, a man tempted to go his own way should have a plan of where he is “going”. If is he simply avoiding relationships, he won’t actually get anywhere in life. Instead he needs to have a mission, things he wants to accomplish, instead of people he fears and avoids. You are what you do, not what you avoid.

The MGTOW have a lot a valid arguments. In the current mainstream culture, why would a man want to be vulnerable to the very serious risks inherent in modern marriage?
The Bible gives some answers, a man has to consider if they are valid for his personal situation.
A fully developed man is expected to be able to provide not just for himself, but for a wife and children. A man has potential be more than just an ends unto himself. He can build a business, employ others, feed others. A grown man knows his capabilities and can choose for himself if he wants to do so. He can build a legacy.
More than that, the Bible states “it is not good for man to be alone, I will make him a helper corresponding to him” (Genesis 2:18). The Bible is called Torat Haim literally “instructions for life”. It is the manual for humanity written by the Creator who created humanity. The Bible reveals to us that it is a feature of men that it is not good for a us to be alone. A man needs companionship. Immediately after this statement God creates a woman fitting for the man.
Now, this feature can certainly be a vulnerability, as the MGTOW rightly point out, but can also be a tremendous source of comfort and merit for men, and fill an innate emotional need. Men do want meaningful, committed relationships with women – when they won’t get destroyed for committing. Also, being able to start and maintain a healthy relationship on your terms is a sign of personal maturity.
Is the Bible telling men to get married? Yes, but only in a society that practices conventional, traditional marriage, and reinforces the biological reality that the man is the head of the household. For Aaron’s sons, they were part of a culture that valued marriage and family, and celebrated loyalty.
Women were expected to join and support their men in divine service, adding to the mission of the men, not subtracting. See our discussions beginning with Are Jewish women different? Indeed, much of our learning in the book of Genesis touches on this theme, and we noted the loyalty of Jewish women in our traditional culture in Exodus: Women and assimilation.
Nadav and Avihu lived in a culture that had their back. As two of the only five Priests at the time, they were at the pinnacle of the social-religious hierarchy. They could have sought out righteous wives from the best families and found young women that could complement their fiery devotion to divine service instead of hindering it.
Their mistake was thinking they would not find a woman who would be totally devoted to following their mission. In the ancient Jewish society, women would be happy to support the Priests. Perhaps in this aspect they were less than fully mature, and did not feel ready to lead wives.
Their brothers Elazar and Itamar did marry and beget children, who became the ancestors of all the current Cohanim. The vast majority of the men you meet named Cohen or Katz descend from the two sons who did marry, this has been shown with genetic testing.
Nadav and Avihu, though they had valid reasons, missed their chance to become patriarchs to the Jewish Priests. All men desire a form of legacy and eternity, and raising their children is the closest most of us can get.
Nadav and Avihu lacked children to give a healthy outlet for their sense of giving. Nadav means donation, Avihu means He is my Father. Biblical names have deeper meanings, their essence was to give, but their giving was misguided. They wanted to give to God, even when no commanded to do so, in part because they lacked the outlet of giving to family and sons. With this in mind, we see that their lack of wives and children was the root cause of their mistake; the Torah alludes to this Numbers 3:4.
Again, this is why a man needs a healthy outlet for his passion. Men are by nature givers, and can naturally produce more than we consume and teach more than just what we learn.
For the high priest the Bible says (Leviticus 16:6) that he atones for “his house”, and house means his wife, who is responsible for his house, and provides a refuge for him, a safe harbor in the world. The man is responsible for the spiritual development of his wife and family, we discussed this in The first family using Abraham and Sarah as example. There is a potential that God built into men to be a guide, educator, and leader for his family. A man who does not step into this role is not fulfilling his potential, he is not using all of his features that he has available from the factory.
However, the woman needs to be fitting for him and assist his mission, not hinder it. It seems to me that Nadav and Avihu lacked complete confidence in their mission as Priests; if they were sure they were fit for this role, then they would have assumed their wives would follow into this solid frame. Nadav and Avihu in some sense were looking for women that do exist, wives who would push them further in their mission. They needed to be the ones to pull their wives along in their holy life, not the other way around.
In modern mainstream culture I would not fault any man for “going his own way”. Be aware that there are serious consequences and risks for men who commit to a wife and family. Yes, there are potential gains. A mature man considers all of the factors. The Bible is not telling you, the modern man today in America, to get married. The men of the Bible would not even recognize what passes for marriage in contemporary secular society.
I get the sense that our ancestors understood all of this much better than we do today. By the time they got married, many times around age 18, our sages had a mastery of wisdom and self knowledge that we can barely hold a candle to. And yet, some of our greatest righteous men did not feel ready to be responsible for others until they had further developed and mastered themselves.
This is an important message for a man considering taking the next step either in a relationship or in his own personal work. Again, the Bible gives you numerous factors to weigh, you are the only one who can decide if they are valid for your personal situation. You choose your way, make it an informed and rational choice.






