Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 88: emotional overflow

The Talmud is discussing the laws of spilling out waste water on Shabbat. We are concerned a person will send water from his private domain to the public thoroughfare. A man is required to make a cesspool or covered drain, to allow wastewater the chance to absorb before running off into the street. Or he can pour onto the roof, and it will run through the gutters and then down to the street. We don’t allow pouring directly to the outside, but indirect flows are allowed.

There is a new development enabled by social media that people will compose an emotional rant, and video their blowout, and share it online for millions to see. These feature yelling, fuming, swearing, and letting it all out. This is akin to allowing emotional waste water to spill into public thoroughfare. Polite society in the recent past strongly objected to people spilling their guts in front of others; today social media encourages this. They gets clicks, the media gets money.

The wisdom of our sages shows us that while we people need to dump their wastewater, this must be done with care to avoid polluting the public. Yes, some runoff will reach the street, but people need to give their extreme emotions the opportunity to absorb in their own private domain first.

Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 87: streaming content

When a stream flows through your walled courtyard there is a disagreement among our sages as to drawing water from it on Shabbat.  The sages in the Mishnah rule that you would need to set up a barrier in the canal at the entrance and exit.  Rabbi Yehuda says the existing walls of the courtyard serve as barriers and you can go ahead and draw water on Shabbat.

The deeper wisdom here is to be aware of what is streaming into your own mind.  There is so much media pushing into your life that even your private time and space can be flooded with content from outside.  Many people have a hard time ignoring their phone when there is a notification to check, and social media can provide a constant stream of notifications.

The sages advise adding a barrier, which does not necessarily block the water, but reminds you that it is from outside and not your personal water source.  Rabbi Yehuda hints to us that if your boundaries are firm, then you do not need to add additional barriers to the streams coming into your space.  For our purposes, both are valid approaches.  You may find that you need to create restrictions on yourself so you are not caught up in the media streaming into your space.

Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 86: dress for success

The Gemara mentions that when a property owner keeps items in a dwelling he lets other people use, those people do not need to join into the Eruv and do not cause problems for others if they do not join.  The owner is still exercising his own property rights to the domicile.  The Gemara gives an example of a wealthy man who let others use his homes as Bonyas, and relates an episode demonstrating his wealth:

The son of Bonyas came before Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi. Realizing from his visitor’s clothing that he was dealing with a wealthy individual, Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi said to his attendants: Make way for one who possesses one hundred maneh, (one hundred times one hundred zuz), as one of this status deserves to be honored in accordance with his riches. Later, another wealthy person came before him, and Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi once again turned to his attendants and said to them:  Make way even more for one who possesses two hundred maneh.  Rabbi Yishmael, son of Rabbi Yosei, said before him: My teacher, Bonyas, father of this one, has a thousand ships out at sea and, corresponding to them, a thousand buildings on land. Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi said to him: When you reach his father, tell him: Do not send him to me in these garments. Dress him in accordance with his wealth and status, so that he will be honored accordingly.

Rabbi Yehuda could tell the difference between a rich man worth 100 or 200 based only on his clothing.  This is amazing.  Judaism values the spirit and intellect, but wealth is also considered given by God as a tool for human use – to assist the community, provide for others, and enable the wealthy to study more.  It is telling that Rabbi Yehuda, himself very wealthy, advised Bonyas to ensure his son dressed befitting his status.  In those days millionaires did not wear jeans and a hoody, they dressed in regal garments.  The way you dress does convey your status to others, and it is important to be aware of this.  People do judge you based on how you look and the impression you give.  You don’t need to dress up every day, but at least wear clean, fitting clothing and be able to up your game when called for.


On that topic:

Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 85: walls make a residence

Today we study a Mishnah about placement of the Eruv, the shared food to allow residents of a common area to combine their property rights and all of them to carry objects there on Shabbat:

One who placed his Eruv of courtyards in a gatehouse or in a portico, a roofed structure without walls or with incomplete walls, or one who deposited it in a balcony, this is not a valid Eruv. And one who resides there, in any of these structures, does not render it prohibited for the homeowner and the other residents of the courtyard to carry, even if he did not contribute to the Eruv.   If, however, one deposited his Eruv in a hay shed or in a cowshed or in a woodshed or in a storehouse, this is a valid Eruv, as it is located in a properly guarded place. And one who resides there with permission, if he neglected to contribute to the Eruv, he renders it prohibited for the homeowner and the other residents of the courtyard to carry.

The factor is that walls make an official, legal residence.  A man could very well decide to sleep in a portico, but that doesn’t make it a residence for Eruv purposes.  Walls allow a man privacy so a man can do what he likes without human observation, and allow a man to be alone with his thoughts, or alone in the presence of God.  Being exposed to other people is not a real residence.  While humans are social creatures, no one can keep that up forever.  Be aware of when you need to get behind walls, literal or figurative, to recharge your social energy.

Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 84: raising vs lowering

The Talmud explores the case where the upper and lower floors in the same yard did not combine in one Eruv.  Areas that are shared between the residents of both levels cannot be used on the Sabbath, since they did not make an Eruv to share these surfaces.  This could be a ledge in between the upper and lower levels for example.  The Gemara debates about an area that is used by both levels, but the people in the lower level need to throw or raise items onto the area while the people above need to lower items onto that area. Rav says this is an equally shared area and forbidden without an Eruv.  Shmuel says we give the area to the people above, since lowering items is easier than throwing, and we give an area to whichever people have the easier way to use that area.

The logic is that downward use is easier than upwards use since gravity helps you.  The wisdom behind this is that going up – in any area of your life – requires more effort than going down.  To accomplish greater things you have to plan and exert yourself to overcome gravity.  If you just go with the flow you end up going down.

Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 83: know how to fuel up

The Talmud is discussing how much food is needed to make the Eruv.  Since the Eruv is sharing food among the residents, we need enough for everyone to share.  We conclude that a proper amount of bread is the amount of Manna that God provided in the wilderness (Exodus 16:36).  The Gemara comments:

From here the Sages also said: One who eats roughly this amount each day, is healthy, as he is able to eat a proper meal; and he is also blessed, as he does not hunger for more. One who eats more than this is a glutton, while one who eats less than this has damaged bowels and must see to his health.

The Rambam (Maimonides) famously writes that a man should only eat 80% of his fill, to give room for proper digestion.  The lesson here is to know how to fuel yourself.  Not just with food, that is obvious.  Keep track of how much sleep you need to stay alert, how much exercise you need to keep your figure.  If you have a sport or martial art, how much training and practice do you require to be competitive?  Plan your fueling needs into your schedule.

Be conscious of how much you are putting in to each area of your life. Putting too much time and energy into one aspect takes away from other things you need to accomplish.  Sometimes you will have to reduce your effort in some areas temporarily to finish a certain project.  Be aware of this and plan to refuel when you can.

Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 82: agree but qualify, gamblers and earners

The Mishnah we are studying includes a statement by Rabbi Yehuda qualifying the words of the Mishnah.  The Gemara brings an explanation that  he was not necessarily disagreeing:

Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said that any place where Rabbi Yehuda says “when”, or “in what case” in the Mishna, he intends only to explain the earlier statement of the Rabbis, not to disagree with them.  And Rabbi Yoḥanan said: The term when indicates that Rabbi Yehuda comes to explain, but the phrase “in what case” indicates that he intends to disagree.

When you are conversing with someone, a powerful style is to agree with them but to qualify their statement to apply to a specific context.  This is what Rabbi Yehuda did in the Mishnah, he was not fighting against the other sages, but explaining why their law should only apply to a limited case.  Practice responding to someone by saying “Yes, but…” or “Yes, and…” and suggest a case where their statement applies without question.  You can get other people to narrow their argument without appearing to be fighting what they are saying.

The Gemara brings an example where Rabbi Yehuda qualifies the sages: The following people are disqualified by the Sages from giving testimony, as they are people who commit transgressions for profit: One who plays with dice for money, and one who lends money at interest, and those who race pigeons (and bet on the races) and those who do commerce with Sabbatical year produce.  Rabbi Yehuda said: When is this so? When he has no occupation other than this one, but if he has a worthy occupation other than this, although he also earns money by these means, this person is qualified to give testimony.

Rashi explains They do not recognize and understand the difficulties and challenges of working men and are not reluctant to cheat them from their hard earned money.

If a man is not engaged in productive activity, he does not have the chance to realize the sacrifice other men make to build up the world and to build themselves into a man.  In modern society many people make a living by separating other men from their money.  In ancient times it was considered best for a man to own his own land and work for himself.  This isn’t always practical, but if you have worked on a personal business you understand the maturity this requires.

Lech Lecha: male rationality, changing female roles

This week we study Genesis 12:1-17:27, called “Lech Lecha” meaning go for yourself.  That was God’s command to our first patriarch Abram to leave his homeland and travel to a new place and become great.  For our convenience we will call Abram and Sarai by their ultimate names, Abraham and Sarah (see Gen 17:5, 15).

First of all, pay attention to God’s language: “go for yourself” implying for your own benefit.  Our sages explain this means go in order to become greater than you are now.

God could simply give orders, He doesn’t.  Instead Abraham is told that by undertaking the difficult step of moving away from his homeland and family he will become something greater, so the whole mission is ultimately for his benefit.  God wants us to become better than we are, and puts us into situations where we have to improve to pass the test.

We discussed this test last time we studied Lech Lecha:

He takes the leap of faith to Israel, only to be tested again and again with difficulties such as famine, war, enemies, family strife, and abductions of his wife.  Abraham is not made into a great nation, he doesn’t even have children.  Again, God repeats that Abraham’s offspring will inherit the land (Genesis 12:7, 13:15, 15:18), and that descendants will become a large nation and become countless in number (Genesis 12:1, 13:16).  When Abraham reminds God that he has no genetic heir, God explicitly states: “the child who will issue from your loins will inherit you” 15:4.

We focused on Sarah (then named Sarai), Abraham’s wife and her internal struggle with victory over hypergamy.  This enabled her to give her handmaid over as a concubine to father children.  This time we will discuss some couple key details about Abraham and Sarah that allowed them to succeed and for Sarah to overcome self interest to nurture the first Jewish family.

The first rational man

We know from our ancient Medrashim (traditions passed down from ancient times that fill in the back story to the Bible) that there were other tests before Abraham left his homeland.  The Medrash explains how Abraham became the first monotheist.  While he was born into a completely idolatrous context, Abraham used rationality to determine that it was better to believe in just One God.

Abraham considered the sun, which many worshiped, and observed that when night fell it’s power was gone.  Likewise the idolized moon, which waxed and waned.

Abraham thought perhaps the great mountains are appropriate to worship, but the wind, rain, and earthquakes wear down and destroy them.  Maybe men should worship the wind and rain?  The wind stops and the sun dries out the water.  Some worship powerful beasts like the lion, but a mere stick can kill it.

Abraham used intellectual and philosophical inquiry to reach the conclusion that monotheism was the only valid faith.  He reasoned out there there was no single physical thing that was permanent and independent, but that all things were interdependent and vulnerable to something else.  Therefore, none of them were worthy of worship.

He logically concluded that there must be one master creator for all these creations.  The Medrash states that Abraham saw the natural forces of the world interacting with purpose, and asked “where is the One Master to this?” 

Then God finally appeared to him.  Using his rational forces to come to belief gave him an advantage over simply being told by God “I am God”.  Abraham did not rely on miracles or prophecy, but on his own mind, his internal intellectual and philosophical power.

The pagan religions of Abraham’s time were not rational but emotional.  If a man wanted a good harvest he went and served the harvest idol or donated to the harvest shamans.  When a kingdom felt they needed success in war they brought sacrifices to the war deity.  If a man felt lonely he could bring gifts to the fertility goddess in order to sleep with one of her temple prostitutes.  Religious practice was all about fulfilling emotional needs.

Idolaters preyed on emotion to manipulate people to bring offerings.  Many societies were shamanistic, with religious and political leaders portraying themselves as representatives of the deities.  They demanded allegiance from regular people and used feelings of religious obligation in their grift.  If a man wanted permission to start a business, he had to bring an offering to the gods, which went into the pockets of the elites.

Various idols were used to make money from the gullible believers, under the illusion that the idols had the power to help them.  Some cults regularly sacrificed men on the bottom rungs of society to “appease the Gods”. They were really removing disenfranchised or discontented people who might rebel against the social order.

Shamanism and magical thinking was the way they ran society and grifted the people.  Abraham took a rational hammer to this emotionally manipulative culture.

Abraham used his intellect to reason that idols were false. Then he went a step further to debate with idolaters and convince them their emotional attachment to idols was illogical.

Abraham was the son of Terah, who built and sold idols for worship.  Having an idol for various deities in the home was normal in the ancient world.  More affluent people would buy larger and more ornate idols to show their devotion to their deities, and as a status symbol.

Abraham would employ logic to convince his father’s customers not to buy and serve idols, arguing that it was inane for them to serve an object that was itself just made and younger than the people themselves.

Once when Terah was gone, Abraham smashed almost all the idols in the shop and placed the hammer on the largest idol, claiming the biggest idol had been jealous and broken the others.  His father and the people of Ur Kasdim replied that it was impossible, an idol can’t break another.  Abraham asked them: if they are powerless then why do you pray to them ?

His rational thinking was undermining the emotional idolatrous culture.  If the people stopped feeling idols could help them, the bribes and offerings to the elite would stop.  The unquestioning allegiance to the shamans, priests, and politicians would wane.  They couldn’t use fear to grift people who developed an intellectual realization of an all powerful One God.

Nimrod arrested Abraham and threw him into a burning furnace.  Miraculously, Abraham was saved.  After seeing the miracle, his brother Haran said he was with Abraham died in that furnace (11:28).

Abraham began to preach that rational people should serve the One God who created everything else.  Abraham has already shown he is not swayed by public opinion or the prevailing cultural values.  He has a rational basis for his faith and preaching, he has evidence.  This gives him a special certainty and makes him dangerous to the idolatrous society.

Abraham’s family, including Terah, leaves Ur Kasdim, under threat from the pagans (11:31).  In Haran, Abraham and Sarah are able to preach monotheism and “make souls” (12:5).  This means by teaching people about monotheism and bringing them to see the reality that One God made everything else, they were credited as if they had created new people.  This is the origin of the term “born again”.

Our sages in the the Talmud (Avodah Zara 9a) explain that the outreach and teaching done by Abraham and Sarah marked the beginning of the era of Torah in this world. Rashi comments on this verse that Abraham taught the men while Sarah taught the women.

In any area of teaching and inspiring others, and especially in personal and spiritual matters, men are better able to connect to other men while women are the same way.

The importance of pitching a tent

Genesis 12:8 “From there he relocated to the mountain east of Bethel and pitched his tent…”

The word tent “ohel” here is written with an ending letter Hey, the feminine possessive suffix, meaning “her tent”.  But the word is pronounced as if it ended in Vav, the masculine suffix for “his tent”.  No, this was not an ancient spelling mistake, there are no mistakes in the Bible.  Rashi explains based on the ancient Medrash Rabbah (39:15) that this change hints to us that Abraham first pitched her tent and afterwards his own.

Some versions of the Rashi add “because a man should honor his wife more than himself”.  We have mentioned that on a practical level women are more attached their home than a man is. They see it as their nest, their place.  There is more wisdom here than a simple lesson in being a nice husband.

Remember: Abraham and Sarah had travelled before and set up their tents before.  Why does the Bible insinuate that Abraham gave extra respect to his wife at this juncture?

There are no accidents or coincidences in the Bible.  Abraham now sets up Sarah’s tent first because God has just informed Abram that they will have children (12:7).  Our ancient sages tell us that Sarah was born infertile.  She certainly prayed for children, but never seriously thought she would give birth since she had not conceived after many years of marriage.

Instead of fixating on a family she would never naturally have, Sarah’s focus was teaching others about God and monotheism.  Abraham would teach the men and she would teach the women (Rashi on Gen 12:5).  She had the statute and gravitas of a tenured professor and the acumen of a popular preacher.  She made a name for herself in public by inspiring her students.  She was running a seminary with thousands of women as her students and protégés.

But her own home, her personal tent, was not important to her. Sarah got her sense of accomplishment outside the home, by interacting with others. She felt important because of her public persona, her success in “making souls” by bringing them into God’s light. Now, when God reveals that she will have children, Abraham sets up her tent first.

Abraham is showing Sarah that she needs to change life focus and understand the importance of her personal tent, her own family. She must refocus on her private home life in preparation for becoming a mother. When she will have a child, her main accomplishments and source of personal pride will be inside her own home, with her own family. With the simple act of setting up her tent, Abraham is showing Sarah that this private mission will become more important than her public life as a teacher and leader.

Gentlemen, there is a huge life lesson here. The things a man tells his woman are important she will feel are truly important. If a man tells his wife over and over that he loves her cooking, she will dedicate more energy to cooking. When a man tells a girl he likes it when she does her hair and makeup so perfectly, she spends more time doing her hair and makeup.

Likewise, if a wife works and the husband goes out of his way to praise her for bringing home the bacon, then she feels that her job is what makes her important. She starts to identify as a working woman, since that is what earns her praise.

The same concept applies to men as well, if you praise a man for his work then he begins to think his work is what makes him a man, and puts more energy into that. But women are especially conscious of how others perceive them, and more apt to change their focus based on the praise they get from the important people in their lives.

Realize that in modern mainstream society this innate responsiveness of women to male praise has been somewhat mitigated. One of the main concepts of modern feminist ideology is to indoctrinate women that they should never do anything for the pleasure of men.

Obviously this indoctrination is not entirely successful, women still do their hair and makeup to attract attention from men. However, as a sop to feminism she might say she is doing it for herself “to look pretty” or “feel good about herself”. Okay, but it still gets attention from men, that is why it feels good to her.

Be aware of how feminist thought impacts modern women. If you tell a woman you want her to do a certain something or wear a specific outfit, she may reject this suggestion. After all, she has been told by our feminist society to be her own independent woman, not to take orders from a man! (The irony that she is expected to take marching orders from radical feminists is lost on most people).  You were too direct, and it triggered resistance programmed into her by mainstream society.

When you are important in her life, then her biology and innate programming tells her that she should try to please you. We see this in young women who start to become interested in a certain genre of music, sports team, or style due to being around a strong male figure with that interest.

A woman naturally wants to get along with and please the powerful men in her life. She will eventually adopt hobbies and interests from those men. If a man pushes her into those things, she will resist. If they are simply interests the man has and she sees the man as her best option in life, she will get into them simply by following this man.

Giving praise to certain activities or efforts a woman makes is much more effective than telling her to change her focus. This is what our patriarch Abraham accomplished by setting up Sarah’s tent in the Holy Land thousands of years ago.

Until that point Sarah had thought her worth in life was only through publicly teaching about God. No doubt Abraham had praised her for that and celebrated her accomplishments. Now God had informed them she would have children, a private mission. In order to get Sarah psychologically ready to change her focus in life, Abraham began to show her the importance of her private life as well.


Beauty and the beast

One of the greatest tests for both Abraham and Sarah was her capture by Pharaoh, the king of Egypt. A famine in the holy land forced them to travel to Egypt. The lead up to this event is very interesting from a gender dynamics perspective:

“As he approached to enter Egypt, he said to Sarai “Behold, now I have known you are a woman with a beautiful appearance. It may be, when the Egyptians see you, they will say this is his wife, and kill me…” (12:11-12)

The word “now” is not extra.  The Medrash explains that Abraham and Sarah were very modest and did not show off their bodies, not even to each other.  Abraham, on an extremely high level of holiness, was not accustomed to looking at his wife, even though she was a looker.

When they arrived at the Nile, Abraham realized that compared to Egyptian women she was extremely attractive.  Rashi also explains the simple reading of the verse: Abraham knew already his wife was beautiful, but did not mention this until they came to Egypt since it was not yet relevant.  Abraham was obviously not in the habit of talking about his wife’s physical beauty.

But now it could lead to conflict.  Abraham knew the reputation of Egyptian men, that they were willing to murder a man to steal his wife.  He suggests that Sarah claim she was his sister instead, to protect his life. This ruse works and Sarah is taken by Pharaoh and Abraham given riches in return.

There is also an Roman history book by Josephus that cites a more ancient history by Berossus the Akkadian reporting that while Abraham was in Egypt he taught mathematics and astronomy to the Egyptian priests.  This could be another cause of Abraham gaining wealth there.

Both the Medrash and Rashi’s simple explanation to 12:11 tell us that Abraham was not used to mentioning Sarah’s beauty, maybe not even consciously aware of it.  This is a very high level of holiness, a man is certainly allowed to look at his own wife and enjoy her beauty.  We should be aware that a normal woman enjoys being praised for her appearance.  Keep in mind that Sarah and Abraham were outliers, on a very high level of spiritual development.  They held physical appearance in less esteem than modern people do.

Rashi (on 12:15) explains that the Egyptian customs agents praised Sarah amongst themselves saying she was fit for the king.  They were likely aware that if they took this beauty for themselves, the king would find out and kill them to get her.  So Sarah was taken directly to the king.  We can only imagine how lustful Pharaoh praised and complimented Sarah for her beauty.

This was a test for Sarah.  Pharaoh was the most powerful man in Egypt, possibly in the ancient world, and he was practically drooling over her beauty!  What an ego boost!  Her own husband did not seem to appreciate her body until he realizes it may get him murdered.  It must have been tempting for her to give in, to be seduced by Pharaoh’s praises.

Sarah instead prays for salvation and God sends an angel to strike Pharaoh whenever he came near her(12:17).  Sarah shows that she is not seduced by flattery but understands the value of beauty.  Jews appreciate beauty, we even have a blessing to recite upon seeing an especially beautiful person.  The words of the blessing reveal how Jewish wisdom relates to physical beauty: “Blessed are You, God, who has such (a beauty) in His world”.

The praise is not to the woman for her beauty, but to God for putting beauty into our world for us to enjoy.  Sarah knew that her beauty was not truly her own, but merely on loan from above.  It was a gift from God, a tool to use for Divine service, not something to take personal pride in.  Not a reason to give in to the animalistic Pharaoh.

This humility is hard to find in modern people.  We do take pride in aspects of ourselves that are really gifts given from God.  Realize that God gives each of us certain strengths or abilities, and also gives us the choice of how to use them.  A naturally large and strong man could bully others, or develop his strength further become an Olympic champion, or use it as a lifeguard.  A cunning man could use his mind to cheat people, or to help them.

So too a beautiful woman, she could use her looks to seduce men and get attention from thousands, or keep them under modest clothing and save them for her own husband, to inspire him to love her even more for her modesty.

A wise man does not praise others for their inherent attributes, but for what they do with those gifts.  It is especially important to praise your woman for the effort she makes to look good for you and appeal to you.  As we explained above, specific praise from a strong man encourages women to put more work in that area.

When Pharaoh returns Sarah to Abraham, Pharaoh takes him to task for being misleading.  Pharaoh was aware that his country was the problem.  They were known for murdering men to take their women.  He knows this as Pharaoh kicks them out of the country to prevent further Divine wrath.  Be aware that when they can, people will try to blame you for their own problems.

Abraham for his part has no question that Sarah was loyal.  The Bible hints to this as well, in 12:4 the verse mentions Abram went, and Lot with him.  Now in 13:1 it states Abram went up from Egypt, he with his wife, and all that he had, and Lot with him.

It appears Abraham was more attentive to his wife after the sojourn in Egypt where she had been praised for physical beauty.  Remember that Abraham found monotheism by intellectual observation and questioning the physical world around him.  He was also an astute observer of human interactions.

Naturally Abraham decided this test was a sign he should pay more heed to his wife’s beauty and spend more time with her.  This order also highlights that his nephew Lot was poised to split off from Abraham.

The first world war

After Lot moves to the Sodom area, God appears to Abraham and promises the holy land to his offspring. However, Abraham is soon tested by war.  Genesis chapter 14 describes how an alliance of four kings invaded and made war on a group of five kings in the holy land, and on other tribes in the area.  One of the kings is identified as Nimrod, who has a vendetta against Abraham for undermining his idolatrous society.  The four kings win the war and capture Abraham’s nephew Lot.  They plan to lure Abraham and destroy him.

Abraham arms his men – 318 men – and goes up against the combined armies of four kings (13:14). Abraham splits his forces and attacks at night, pursues and prevails, returning Lot and the other captives and spoils from Sodom and the neighboring kingdoms.  This sets up a powerful meeting.  Abraham is greeted by Malkitzedek, king of Shalem.  This is actually Shem the son of Noah, who had built the city of Shalem which would later become Jerusalem.

Our sages teach that God’s intent was for all of the descendants of Shem to become a holy nation.  However, Malkitzedek greets Abraham with a blessing – and only after blessing the returning war hero does Malkitzedek bless God who gives victory.  At this juncture God decides that only Abraham’s descendants will become the holy nation, since Abraham was always aware that it was God Himself who made this war happen and allowed Abraham to win (14:22).

The king of Sodom asks Abraham to return the people, and offers that Abraham keep the wealth. Abraham refuses to take anything for himself, but does give shares in the treasure to his men 14:23. Abraham does not want anyone else to claim that he made Abraham rich. He does not want to be beholden to someone else.

This is an interesting concept to keep in mind. Abraham has already displayed independence from the mainstream idolatrous culture and willingness to challenge the status quo. Now he is a war hero to the nation, and could certainly claim the treasure as his own. But he does not want the king of Sodom to be able to say that Abraham’s wealth came from Sodom.

In today’s society it is possible but difficult to be independent of others. With modern technology some men, to some extent, can make a livelihood without being someone’s employee. This is a powerful step to make yourself free from the influence of others. Even if you are not able to do so, it is important to be independent by using your free time for your personal mission, not for someone else’s agenda.

Recognize that in modern culture the media is a huge influence over most people, and that the media creates a subtle push to consume more, be it physical items or entertainment. They are selling your eyeballs to advertisers. When you have a specific mission you want to accomplish in life, you need to be careful not to get wrapped up in the media.

Abraham shows us a prototype of a man who would not be beholden to other people. He had to be strong and independent since he was the only real monotheist in a sea of idolatry. Yes, Malkitzedek, king of Shalem was also a monotheist, but he was isolated in his holy city, not traveling throughout the world to open men’s eyes to the reality of God.

If you are a man with a mission, look for ways to gain independence from what other people think of you.  This allows you more room to maneuver as you travel through life the way you want to.

Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 81: loaf vs slice

The Talmud studies which foods are needed to form an Eruv.  Recall that each resident contributes some food which is placed into one of the homes in the courtyard.  Since home is where your food is, this creates a situation where all the residents are considered to share a home.  Then everyone can carry in the courtyard on Shabbat.

While any food can work, when bread is used you must contribute a whole loaf.  A small loaf works, but a larger piece from a huge loaf does not.  The reason is that giving just a slice creates animosity. When other men are giving a whole loaf, giving a slice makes it look like you are merely donating your leftovers.

When you are teaming up with other men to accomplish a mission, give it your all.  Be aware of what you are able to contribute, even if it is smaller than what others give, if you are 100% present and committed that is sufficient.  Don’t be the guy on the team who talks big but gives a little or is distracted from the group.  That would be bringing a slice from a big loaf.  Even if he is giving more than you, everyone else sees that he is not giving all he could.

Daily dose of wisdom, Eruvin 80: behind her husband’s back

The Gemara brings a case where a man refused to lease out his property rights in order to allow Jews to carry in the courtyard.  The sages ruled that if he refused, they could ask his wife to lease instead, since she also had rights to the area.  However, the Gemara brings a statement that women joining into the Eruv without their husbands’ consent is invalid.  Our sages reconcile this that when failing to join would create problems for others then she has permission to join even if the husband objects.  If her family not joining would not cause problems to others, she cannot.  Shmuel supports this, ruling that if a man regularly joins the Eruv but did not this week, the wife can join.

This is an interesting concept.  Obviously the husband and wife should work together and no one should go behind the other’s back.  However, our sages allowed the wife to join the Eruv – by donating food her husband owns – when the husband’s refusal would impact other families.  A man needs to balance his responsibilities to himself and his own family with those to the outside society.  While a man should lead in his marriage, if he does not realize that he is undermining other people then the wife may need to act independently.